Start Searching the Answers
The Internet has many places to ask questions about anything imaginable and find past answers on almost everything.
The Question & Answer (Q&A) Knowledge Managenet
The Internet has many places to ask questions about anything imaginable and find past answers on almost everything.
But Big O notation focuses on the worst-case scenario, which is 0(n) for simple search. It’s a reassurance that simple search will never be slower than O(n) time.
Each iteration in the while loop, either one or both indexes move toward each other. In the worst case, only one index moves toward each other at any time. The loop iterates n-1 times, but the time complexity of the entire algorithm is O(n log n) due to sorting.
Conclusion. The for , while , and do-while loops all have similar performance characteristics, and so no one loop type is significantly faster or slower than the others. Avoid the for-in loop unless you need to iterate over a number of unknown object properties.
big O notation
If a loop exists inside the body of another loop, it’s called a nested loop. Here’s an example of the nested for loop. // outer loop for (int i = 1; i <= 5; ++i) { // codes // inner loop for(int j = 1; j <=2; ++j) { // codes } .. } Here, we are using a for loop inside another for loop.
Originally Answered: How can I avoid nested “for loop” for optimize my code? Sort the array first. Then run once over it and count consecutive elements. For each count larger than 1, compute count-choose-2 and sum them up.
Nested loops are frequently (but not always) bad practice, because they’re frequently (but not always) overkill for what you’re trying to do. In many cases, there’s a much faster and less wasteful way to accomplish the goal you’re trying to achieve.
The inner loop is nested inside the outer loop. Nested loops are useful when for each pass through the outer loop, you need to repeat some action on the data in the outer loop. For example, you read a file line by line and for each line you must count how many times the word “the” is found.
product was significantly slower than my nested for loops. The results from profiling (based on 10 runs per method) was an average of ~0.8 seconds for the nested for loop approach and ~1.3 seconds for the itertools.
Nested iterations are not necessarily a bad thing. Even many well-known algorithms rely on them. But you have to be extremely cautious what you execute in the deepest loop, since these commands will be performed very often. You may consider a different style to loop over the arrays.
Any number of loops can be defined inside another loop, i.e., there is no restriction for defining any number of loops. The nesting level can be defined at n times. You can define any type of loop inside another loop; for example, you can define ‘while’ loop inside a ‘for’ loop. // inner loop statements.
Avoid Heavy Nesting A really bad idea is to nest loops inside loops as that also means taking care of several iterator variables (i,j,k,l,m…). You can avoid heavy nesting and loops inside loops with specialized tool methods.
Instead of looping (6*3=) 18 times, you only need to loop (6+3=) 9 times. I made the code a little bit more complex to take duplicates into account, hence the second for loop (j). You could take a Map and collect all same values in an array for later concatination with the result set.
While Loop Might Never End The principal complaint about while loops is that they may never end: while (true) { } This is the infinite loop. If it ever happens that you construct an infinite loop in code, that code will become non-responsive at run time.
for loops–and while loops– are what’s known as control statements, meaning they must be placed inside of a function and can not be used as standalones. This inherently increases the chance you’ll end up manipulating variables outside of the loop’s scope.
A first straight forward approach would be like this:
Algorithm to optimize nested loops
Reducing Cyclomatic Complexity
To your other question, the answer is no. They aren’t always O(n^2) . You can easily create a situation where one of the loops affects the iterations of the other, yielding a different complexity.
The loop executes N times, so the sequence of statements also executes N times. In a common special case where the stopping condition of the inner loop is j < N instead of j < M (i.e., the inner loop also executes N times), the total complexity for the two loops is O(N2).
Thought exercise: Can you make everything a nested loop can with just a normal loop? Can you draw out an example? Answer: Yes, you can, but it is a lot more difficult. Nested loops make programs simpler.
To calculate the running time, find the maximum number of nested loops that go through a significant portion of the input. Some algorithms use nested loops where the outer loop goes through an input n while the inner loop goes through a different input m. The time complexity in such cases is O(nm).
4) O(Logn) Time Complexity of a loop is considered as O(Logn) if the loop variables is divided / multiplied by a constant amount. For example Binary Search(refer iterative implementation) has O(Logn) time complexity. Let us see mathematically how it is O(Log n). The series that we get in first loop is 1, c, c2, c3, …
A posttest loop is one in which the block is to be repeated until the specified condition is no longer true, and the condition is tested after the block is executed.
Because do while loops check the condition after the block is executed, the control structure is often also known as a post-test loop. Contrast with the while loop, which tests the condition before the code within the block is executed, the do-while loop is an exit-condition loop.